Federal · Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
28 U.S.C. § 137: Division of business among district judges
Read the full statutory text
The business of a court having more than one judge shall be divided among the judges as provided by the rules and orders of the court. The chief judge of the district court shall be responsible for the observance of such rules and orders, and shall divide the business and assign the cases so far as such rules and orders do not otherwise prescribe. If the district judges in any district are unable to agree upon the adoption of rules or orders for that purpose the judicial council of the circuit shall make the necessary orders. In this paragraph, the term “performing rights society” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 17 . a judge to whom continuing jurisdiction over any performing rights society for any performing rights society consent decree is assigned or has previously been assigned; or a judge to whom another proceeding concerning an application for the determination of a reasonable license fee is assigned at the time of the filing of the application. Subparagraph (B) does not apply to an application to determine reasonable license fees made by individual proprietors under section 513 of title 17 . Nothing in paragraph (1) shall modify the rights of any party to a consent decree or to a proceeding to determine reasonable license fees, to make an application for the construction of any provision of the applicable consent decree. Such application shall be referred to the judge to whom continuing jurisdiction over the applicable consent decree is currently assigned. If any such application is made in connection with a rate proceeding, such rate proceeding shall be stayed until the final determination of the construction application. Disputes in connection with a rate proceeding about whether a licensee is similarly situated to another licensee shall not be subject to referral to the judge with continuing jurisdiction over the applicable consent decree. those district judges of that district court who request to hear cases under which 1 or more issues arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents or plant variety protection are required to be decided, are designated by the chief judge of the court to hear those cases; cases described in subparagraph (A) are randomly assigned to the judges of the district court, regardless of whether the judges are designated under subparagraph (A); a judge not designated under subparagraph (A) to whom a case is assigned under subparagraph (B) may decline to accept the case; and a case declined under subparagraph (C) is randomly reassigned to 1 of those judges of the court designated under subparagraph (A). Senior judges of a district court may be designated under paragraph (1)(A) if at least 1 judge of the court in regular active service is also so designated. This section shall not be construed to limit the ability of a judge to request the reassignment of or otherwise transfer a case to which the judge is assigned under this section, in accordance with otherwise applicable rules of the court. Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [ Jan. 4, 2011 ], the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall designate not less than 6 United States district courts, in at least 3 different judicial circuits, in which the program established under subsection (a) will be carried out. the 15 district courts in which the largest number of patent and plant variety protection cases were filed in the most recent calendar year that has ended; or the district courts that have adopted, or certified to the Director the intention to adopt, local rules for patent and plant variety protection cases. 3 district courts that each have at least 10 district judges authorized to be appointed by the President, whether under section 133(a) of title 28 , United States Code, or on a temporary basis under any other provision of law, and at least 3 judges of the court have made the request under subsection (a)(1)(A); and 3 district courts that each have fewer than 10 district judges authorized to be appointed by the President, whether under section 133(a) of title 28 , United States Code, or on a temporary basis under any other provision of law, and at least 2 judges of the court have made the request under subsection (a)(1)(A). The program established under subsection (a) shall terminate 10 years after the end of the 6-month period described in subsection (b). The program established under subsection (a) shall apply in a district court designated under subsection (b) only to cases commenced on or after the date of such designation. an analysis of the extent to which the program has succeeded in developing expertise in patent and plant variety protection cases among the district judges of the district courts so designated; an analysis of the extent to which the program has improved the efficiency of the courts involved by reason of such expertise; the rate of reversal by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, of such cases on the issues of claim construction and substantive patent law; and the period of time elapsed from the date on which a case is filed to the date on which trial begins or summary judgment is entered; a discussion of any evidence indicating that litigants select certain of the judicial districts designated under subsection (b) in an attempt to ensure a given outcome; and an analysis of whether the pilot program should be extended to other district courts, or should be made permanent and apply to all district courts. not later than the date that is 5 years and 3 months after the end of the 6-month period described in subsection (b); and not later than 5 years after the date described in subparagraph (A). The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with the chief judge of each of the district courts designated under subsection (b) and the Director of the Federal Judicial Center, shall keep the committees referred to in paragraph (1) informed, on a periodic basis while the pilot program is in effect, with respect to the matters referred to in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1).”
Verify at the official source: Federal legislative text
Facing this? Know exactly what happens next.
MOFRD turns this code section into your situation: the deadlines that apply to you, the forms your county uses, and the resolution paths people in your position actually take. Free for 3 days — no card required.
This page is legal information, not legal advice. Code text is sourced from official publications and may lag amendments — always confirm at the official source linked above. Plain-English summaries and relationship data are AI-derived and reviewed on an ongoing basis; verify with a licensed attorney before acting.