Federal · Title 42 — Public Health and Welfare

42 U.S.C. § 1320a: Guidance regarding application of health care fraud and abuse sanctions

Civil

What this law says, in plain English

This statute establishes procedures for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue regulations creating safe harbors that protect certain health care payment practices from criminal fraud prosecution and exclusion from federal programs.

Read the full statutory text
modifications to existing safe harbors issued pursuant to section 14(a) of the Medicare and Medicaid Patient and Program Protection Act of 1987 ( 42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b note); additional safe harbors specifying payment practices that shall not be treated as a criminal offense under section 1320a–7b(b) of this title and shall not serve as the basis for an exclusion under section 1320a–7(b)(7) of this title ; advisory opinions to be issued pursuant to subsection (b); and special fraud alerts to be issued pursuant to subsection (c). After considering the proposals described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall publish in the Federal Register proposed modifications to existing safe harbors and proposed additional safe harbors, if appropriate, with a 60-day comment period. After considering any public comments received during this period, the Secretary shall issue final rules modifying the existing safe harbors and establishing new safe harbors, as appropriate. The Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the “Inspector General”) shall, in an annual report to Congress or as part of the year-end semiannual report required by section 405 of title 5 , describe the proposals received under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) and explain which proposals were included in the publication described in subparagraph (B), which proposals were not included in that publication, and the reasons for the rejection of the proposals that were not included. An increase or decrease in access to health care services. An increase or decrease in the quality of health care services. An increase or decrease in patient freedom of choice among health care providers. An increase or decrease in competition among health care providers. An increase or decrease in the ability of health care facilities to provide services in medically underserved areas or to medically underserved populations. An increase or decrease in the cost to Federal health care programs (as defined in section 1320a–7b(f) of this title ). An increase or decrease in the potential overutilization of health care services. whether to order a health care item or service; or whether to arrange for a referral of health care items or services to a particular practitioner or provider. Any other factors the Secretary deems appropriate in the interest of preventing fraud and abuse in Federal health care programs (as so defined). Not later than one year after December 29, 2022 , the Inspector General shall conduct a review on whether to establish a safe harbor described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii) for evidence-based contingency management incentives and the parameters for such a safe harbor. In conducting the review under the previous sentence, the Inspector General shall consider the extent to which providing such a safe harbor for evidence-based contingency management incentives may result in any of the factors described in paragraph (2). Not later than two years after December 29, 2022 , the Secretary and the Inspector General shall submit to Congress recommendations, including based on the review conducted under subparagraph (A), for improving access to evidence-based contingency management interventions while ensuring quality of care, ensuring fidelity to evidence-based practices, and including strong program integrity safeguards that prevent increased waste, fraud, and abuse and prevent medically unnecessary or inappropriate items or services reimbursed in whole or in part by a Federal health care program. The Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall issue written advisory opinions as provided in this subsection. What constitutes prohibited remuneration within the meaning of section 1320a–7b(b) of this title or section 1320a–7a(i)(6) of this title . Whether an arrangement or proposed arrangement satisfies the criteria set forth in section 1320a–7b(b)(3) of this title for activities which do not result in prohibited remuneration. Whether an arrangement or proposed arrangement satisfies the criteria which the Secretary has established, or shall establish by regulation for activities which do not result in prohibited remuneration. What constitutes an inducement to reduce or limit services to individuals entitled to benefits under subchapter XVIII or subchapter XIX within the meaning of section 1320a–7a(b) of this title . Whether any activity or proposed activity constitutes grounds for the imposition of a sanction under section 1320a–7, 1320a–7a, or 1320a–7b of this title. Whether the fair market value shall be, or was paid or received for any goods, services or property. Whether an individual is a bona fide employee within the requirements of section 3121(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Each advisory opinion issued by the Secretary shall be binding as to the Secretary and the party or parties requesting the opinion. The failure of a party to seek an advisory opinion may not be introduced into evidence to prove that the party intended to violate the provisions of sections 1 1320a–7, 1320a–7a, or 1320a–7b of this title. 1 So in original. Probably should be “section”. the procedure to be followed by a party applying for an advisory opinion; the procedure to be followed by the Secretary in responding to a request for an advisory opinion; the interval in which the Secretary shall respond; the reasonable fee to be charged to the party requesting an advisory opinion; and the manner in which advisory opinions will be made available to the public. the Secretary shall be required to issue to a party requesting an advisory opinion by not later than 60 days after the request is received; and the fee charged to the party requesting an advisory opinion shall be equal to the costs incurred by the Secretary in responding to the request. This subsection shall apply to requests for advisory opinions made on or after the date which is 6 months after August 21, 1996 . Any person may present, at any time, a request to the Inspector General for a notice which informs the public of practices which the Inspector General considers to be suspect or of particular concern under the Medicare program under subchapter XVIII or a State health care program, as defined in section 1320a–7(h) of this title (in this subsection referred to as a “special fraud alert”). Upon receipt of a request described in subparagraph (A), the Inspector General shall investigate the subject matter of the request to determine whether a special fraud alert should be issued. If appropriate, the Inspector General shall issue a special fraud alert in response to the request. All special fraud alerts issued pursuant to this subparagraph shall be published in the Federal Register. whether and to what extent the practices that would be identified in the special fraud alert may result in any of the consequences described in subsection (a)(2); and the volume and frequency of the conduct that would be identified in the special fraud alert.

Verify at the official source: Federal legislative text

Facing this? Know exactly what happens next.

MOFRD turns this code section into your situation: the deadlines that apply to you, the forms your county uses, and the resolution paths people in your position actually take. Free for 3 days — no card required.

This page is legal information, not legal advice. Code text is sourced from official publications and may lag amendments — always confirm at the official source linked above. Plain-English summaries and relationship data are AI-derived and reviewed on an ongoing basis; verify with a licensed attorney before acting.