16 U.S.C. § 1433: Sanctuary designation standards

the designation will fulfill the purposes and policies of this chapter; its conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological, educational, or esthetic qualities; the communities of living marine resources it harbors; or its resource or human-use values; existing State and Federal authorities are inadequate or should be supplemented to ensure coordinated and comprehensive conservation and management of the area, including resource protection, scientific research, and public education; designation of the area as a national marine sanctuary will facilitate the objectives stated in paragraph (3); and the area is of a size and nature that will permit comprehensive and coordinated conservation and management. the area’s natural resource and ecological qualities, including its contribution to biological productivity, maintenance of ecosystem structure, maintenance of ecologically or commercially important or threatened species or species assemblages, maintenance of critical habitat of endangered species, and the biogeographic representation of the site; the area’s historical, cultural, archaeological, or paleontological significance; the present and potential uses of the area that depend on maintenance of the area’s resources, including commercial and recreational fishing, subsistence uses, other commercial and recreational activities, and research and education; the present and potential activities that may adversely affect the factors identified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C); the existing State and Federal regulatory and management authorities applicable to the area and the adequacy of those authorities to fulfill the purposes and policies of this chapter; the manageability of the area, including such factors as its size, its ability to be identified as a discrete ecological unit with definable boundaries, its accessibility, and its suitability for monitoring and enforcement activities; the public benefits to be derived from sanctuary status, with emphasis on the benefits of long-term protection of nationally significant resources, vital habitats, and resources which generate tourism; the negative impacts produced by management restrictions on income-generating activities such as living and nonliving resources development; the socioeconomic effects of sanctuary designation; the area’s scientific value and value for monitoring the resources and natural processes that occur there; the feasibility, where appropriate, of employing innovative management approaches to protect sanctuary resources or to manage compatible uses; and the value of the area as an addition to the System. the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; the Secretaries of State, Defense, Transportation, and the Interior, the Administrator, and the heads of other interested Federal agencies; the responsible officials or relevant agency heads of the appropriate State and local government entities, including coastal zone management agencies, that will or are likely to be affected by the establishment of the area as a national marine sanctuary; the appropriate officials of any Regional Fishery Management Council established by section 302 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1852 ) that may be affected by the proposed designation; and other interested persons.