10 U.S.C. § 181: Joint Requirements Oversight Council

There is a Joint Requirements Oversight Council in the Department of Defense. evaluating global trends, emerging threats, and adversary capabilities to inform understanding of joint operational problems and to shape joint force design; coordinating with commanders of combatant commands to compile, refine, and prioritize joint operational problems; continuously reviewing and assessing joint military capabilities of elements of the Department of Defense listed in section 111(b) of this title in a manner that meets applicable requirements in the national defense strategy under section 113(g) of this title ; identifying and prioritizing gaps and opportunities in joint military capabilities, including making recommendations for changes to address such capability and capacity gaps; identifying advances in technology, innovative commercial solutions, and concepts of operation that could improve the military advantage of the joint force; describe the joint operational problem to provide necessary context for the joint capability requirement; proposes nonprescriptive solutions to joint operational problems; and ensures system interoperability, where appropriate, between and among joint military capabilities; addresses joint operational problems; and evaluates force design initiatives of the Armed Forces to recommend acceptance, mitigation, or alternative force designs for the joint force; maintaining a repository of joint operational problems and identification of capabilities to address those problems; and evaluating effect of joint military capability requirements for the purposes of section 4376(a) of this title . The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who is the Chair of the Council and is the principal adviser to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for making recommendations about joint military capabilities. An Army officer in the grade of general. A Navy officer in the grade of admiral. An Air Force officer in the grade of general. A Marine Corps officer in the grade of general. A Space Force officer in the grade of general. Members of the Council under subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1) shall be selected by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after consultation with the Secretary of Defense, from officers in the grade of general or admiral, as the case may be, who are recommended for selection by the Secretary of the military department concerned. In making any recommendation to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as described in paragraph (1)(A), the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide the Chairman any dissenting view of members of the Council under paragraph (1) with respect to such recommendation. The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. shall provide assistance in evaluating the technical feasibility of requirements under development; and shall identify options for expanding or generating new requirements based on opportunities provided by new or emerging technologies. The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. The commander of a combatant command when matters related to the area of responsibility or functions of that command are under consideration by the Council. The Council shall seek and strongly consider input from the commanders of the combatant commands in carrying out its mission under subsection (b). The Council shall seek and consider the views of the service chiefs in their roles as end users of capabilities delivered by the defense acquisition system on matters pertaining to a capability proposed by an armed force, Defense Agency, or other entity of the Department of Defense. The Council shall seek and consider the views of the Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau regarding non-Federalized National Guard capabilities in support of homeland defense and civil support missions. The Council shall seek views from private entities on commercially available technology to address joint operational problems or gaps in joint military capabilities. Each service chief is responsible for the capability requirements of the armed force of such service chief. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that analytical organizations within the Department of Defense, such as the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation and mission engineering activities, provide resources and expertise to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council to assist the Council in performing the mission in subsection (b). The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, in the case of a recommendation by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Secretary that is approved by the Secretary, oversight information with respect to such recommendation that is produced as a result of the activities of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council is made available in a timely fashion to the congressional defense committees. The term “joint capability requirement” means a capability that is critical or essential to address a joint operational problem. The term “joint military capabilities” means the collective capabilities across the joint force, including both joint and force-specific capabilities, that are available to conduct military operations. means a challenge across the joint force in achieving an assigned military objective based on current doctrine, emerging threats or future concepts; and may include limitations in capabilities, capacity, resources, or the ability to effectively and efficiently coordinate across the joint force, with another combatant command, or among joint military capabilities. The term “oversight information” means information and materials comprising analysis and justification that are prepared to support a recommendation that is made to, and approved by, the Secretary of Defense. The term “service chief” has the meaning given in section 3101 of this title . full consideration of possible trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives for each alternative considered; and an assessment of whether or not the joint military requirement can be met in a manner that is consistent with the cost and schedule objectives recommended by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council.”