California · Revenue and Taxation Code - RTC
RTC §19802: (a) In the determination of any case arising under this part, the rule of res judicata is applicable only if the liability involved is for the same year as was involved in another case previously dete
Read the full statutory text
(a) In the determination of any case arising under this part, the rule of res judicata is applicable only if the liability involved is for the same year as was involved in another case previously determined. (b) Notwithstanding the holding in Pope Estate Company v. Johnson, 43 Cal. App. 2d 170, in any action filed pursuant to Section 19382 (relating to taxpayer suits for refund), in addition to the defenses or relief sought in the action, the Franchise Tax Board shall assert in defense only those unpaid liabilities of the taxpayer for the same year which are evidenced by any of the following: (1) A final proposed assessment. (2) A notice of tax due. (3) A final notice of action. In addition, any refund claim of a taxpayer for the same year resulting from a federal audit adjustment made subsequent to the filing of the action need not be asserted by the taxpayer in that action.
Verify at the official source: California legislative text
Facing this? Know exactly what happens next.
MOFRD turns this code section into your situation: the deadlines that apply to you, the forms your county uses, and the resolution paths people in your position actually take. Free for 3 days — no card required.
This page is legal information, not legal advice. Code text is sourced from official publications and may lag amendments — always confirm at the official source linked above. Plain-English summaries and relationship data are AI-derived and reviewed on an ongoing basis; verify with a licensed attorney before acting.