California · Revenue and Taxation Code - RTC

RTC §21022: (a) Except as provided in subdivision (f), if any officer or employee of the board intentionally settles the determination or compromises the collection of any tax due from an attorney, certified publ

Civil

What this law says, in plain English

A taxpayer may sue the State of California in civil court if a board officer intentionally settles or compromises tax collection in exchange for information obtained through attorney-client or professional advisor communications, seeking actual damages up to $500,000.

Read the full statutory text
(a) Except as provided in subdivision (f), if any officer or employee of the board intentionally settles the determination or compromises the collection of any tax due from an attorney, certified public accountant, or tax preparer (as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 19169) representing a taxpayer, in exchange for information conveyed by the taxpayer to the attorney, certified public accountant, or tax preparer for purposes of obtaining advice concerning the taxpayer’s tax liability, the taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the State of California in superior court. The civil action shall be the exclusive remedy for recovering damages resulting from the acts described in this subdivision. (b) In any action brought under subdivision (a), upon the finding of liability on the part of the defendant, the defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff in an amount equal to the lesser of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or the sum of all the following: (1) Actual, direct economic damages sustained by the plaintiff as a proximate result of the information disclosure. (2) The costs of the action. (c) Damages shall not include the taxpayer’s liability for any civil or criminal penalties or other losses attributable to incarceration or the imposition of other criminal sanctions. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action to enforce liability created under this section may be brought without regard to the amount in controversy, and may be brought only within two years after the date the actions creating the liability would have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable care. (e) Upon certification of the executive officer of the board, or the executive officer’s delegate, that criminal charges have been filed against the taxpayer, the court before which an action under this section is pending shall stay all proceedings with respect to the action, pending the resolution of those criminal charges. Certification authorized by this subdivision shall comply with the requirements of Section 19542. (f) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to information conveyed to an attorney, certified public accountant, or tax preparer for the purpose of perpetrating a fraud or crime. (g) This section is operative for actions filed on or after January 1, 1998.

Verify at the official source: California legislative text

Facing this? Know exactly what happens next.

MOFRD turns this code section into your situation: the deadlines that apply to you, the forms your county uses, and the resolution paths people in your position actually take. Free for 3 days — no card required.

This page is legal information, not legal advice. Code text is sourced from official publications and may lag amendments — always confirm at the official source linked above. Plain-English summaries and relationship data are AI-derived and reviewed on an ongoing basis; verify with a licensed attorney before acting.